Bruce Fink – Gods in the Real

Bruce Fink has a nice interpretation of Lacan’s claim that the Gods belong to the real. He wrote: “When Lacan tells us that the gods belong to the real and are a mode of revelation of the real [pp. 44, 82, in Seminar VIII], he is clearly referring to the multiplicity of gods associated with different facets of nature – immanent in nature and in natural events like storms, lightning, thunder, and wind – that are independent of our will and do with us as they please. […].” This is from his new book on Love, “Lacan on Love: An Exploration of Lacan’s Seminar VIII, Transference.”
 
Here, finally, Fink begins to develop his 1995 claim that for Lacan there is a “first order real,” and not only the second order real of the objet petit a. We can also see how this overcomes the sort of idealist correlationism often attributed to Lacanian psychoanalysis. Finally, this language of “multiplicity” within the real brings us to an even more interesting connection to the ontology of Alain Badiou.
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s